• Economy
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Stock
Keep Over Tradings – Economy, Investing, Editor's Pick, Stock
Economy

Trump’s “Art of the Deal” Politics Undermines America’s Future

by June 26, 2025
by June 26, 2025

In game theory, a “first-mover advantage” gives the opening player the power to set the rules of engagement. President Donald Trump built much of his political brand — and his Art of the Deal persona — on this idea: act big, set the tone, make others play defense. The strategy is simple: push hard up front, frame the deal, and only backtrack if necessary. It’s a tactic that can yield results in business, where individual stakes are limited and profit-and-loss signals keep players accountable.

But politics and governance aren’t business transactions. They’re repeated, dynamic games with millions of stakeholders, unclear incentives, and no bottom-line feedback. In this setting, the first-mover tactic, combined with erratic unpredictability, doesn’t create leverage — it creates dysfunction.

As Trump himself recently said on the White House lawn:

“I may do it… I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do.”

That kind of uncertainty may work in a poker game — but it’s catastrophic for the economy. It undermines trust, destabilizes markets, and delays investment. And we’ve seen the consequences of this “nobody knows” governing style play out across nearly every major policy initiative — from trade and taxes to tariffs and pandemics.

Strategic Blunders in Economic Policy

Take trade policy. The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) didn’t improve on NAFTA — it layered on more restrictions, mandates, and regulatory hurdles, making trade less free. It imposed stricter rules of origin, weakened investor protections, and made regional auto manufacturing more expensive. Rather than liberalizing trade, it entrenched protectionism under a new name.

Meanwhile, Trump’s tariffs are one of the largest tax increases on Americans. The Tax Foundation estimated that US tariffs imposed from 2018–2020 raised tax revenues by over $80 billion annually and increased consumer costs by an average of $1,277 per household. Retaliatory tariffs from China, the EU, and others directly harmed US exporters, especially in agriculture and manufacturing.

Even the widely publicized “Phase One” trade deal with China fell short. China failed to meet its purchase commitments, and the structural reforms promised — on intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers — never materialized. Strategic ambiguity resulted in economic underperformance.

Uncertainty Is a Tax on Growth

In economics, uncertainty acts like a tax on business decisions. Research shows that policy uncertainty reduces private investment, hiring, and innovation. The Hoover Institution noted that by 2019, Trump’s trade war and erratic regulatory threats were already slowing business investment before COVID hit.

Tax reform followed the same chaotic path. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made some positive moves — cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, doubling the standard deduction, and improving full expensing. But it was undermined by temporary provisions and a lack of spending restraint. The Manhattan Institute found that despite strong pre-COVID growth, the Trump administration added $4.7 trillion to the national debt, including $3.9 trillion in new borrowing from legislation signed into law. 

Why? As I found while working at the White House then, sending fiscal progressives like Steven Mnuchin to negotiate massive spending bills was a mistake. At the White House Office of Management and Budget, we saw how Mnuchin consistently prioritized deal-making over fiscal discipline — resulting in bloated omnibus bills and exploding deficits.

Pandemic Panic and Government Overreach

COVID-19 response amplified these failures. What began as “15 days to slow the spread” became 15 months of federal overreach, lockdowns, and more than $5 trillion in COVID-related spending. Much of it — like enhanced unemployment benefits and state bailouts — was extended long after the emergency faded.

This was not a market correction. It was a government overreaction to previous government failures. The Congressional Budget Office reported that federal spending reached 31 percent of GDP in 2020 — exceeding even World War II levels as a share of the economy. That’s not “stimulus” — it’s control.

The Wrong Game, the Wrong Incentives

In business, unpredictability might create bargaining power. In government, it creates instability. That’s because public policy affects long-term decisions across millions of households and firms. Public choice theory explains how politicians often respond to the wrong incentives — seeking short-term wins instead of long-term outcomes.

We saw it with proposals to block Nippon Steel’s acquisition of U.S. Steel. It’s a private deal, but political posturing — under both Trump and Biden — has turned it into a nationalist spectacle. It’s great that Trump recently approved it, but not after making it politically-charged, more restrictive, and an agreement that presidents shouldn’t get involved in. Likewise, new tariffs on $18 billion in Chinese imports will raise prices, reduce output, not solve perceived trade problems, and be a drag on other pro-growth efforts by Trump.

The outcome? Higher costs. More uncertainty. Less investment. Slower growth.

The Way Forward: Economic Freedom Over Erratic Power

There’s still time to get it right. The presidency is a powerful platform — but it should be used to unleash markets, not micromanage them. That starts with credible first moves that restore fiscal sanity, reduce tax burdens, lift regulatory burdens, and build trust through policy stability.

We should learn from bold reformers like Argentina’s Javier Milei, who are shrinking government and restoring trust in free markets. In the US, we have the tools — we just lack the direction and leadership to a brighter future.

What America needs isn’t another flawed deal. It needs a direction rooted in liberty, stability, and prosperity. As I often say, let people prosper. That’s the real art of leadership.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Is the GENIUS Act Creating a Shadow CBDC System?
next post
Central Bank Independence: More Heat than Light

Related Posts

Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?

July 8, 2025

New Yorkers Flirt with Socialist Grocery Store Scheme

July 8, 2025

Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 

July 8, 2025

Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 

July 8, 2025

Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?

July 8, 2025

New Yorkers Flirt with Socialist Grocery Store Scheme

July 8, 2025

Fed’s Bowman on the Risks of ‘Set It...

July 8, 2025

After Harvard: Dismantle the Infrastructure of Racial Preference

July 7, 2025

Populist Rage Against Credit Cards Will Backfire on...

July 7, 2025

What Is the Jones Act—and Can It Be...

July 7, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?
  • New Yorkers Flirt with Socialist Grocery Store Scheme
  • Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 
  • Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 
  • Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?

    July 8, 2025
  • New Yorkers Flirt with Socialist Grocery Store Scheme

    July 8, 2025
  • Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 

    July 8, 2025
  • Supreme Court Delivers Parents a Partial Victory 

    July 8, 2025
  • Do Low-Tax States Win More Stanley Cups?

    July 8, 2025
  • New Yorkers Flirt with Socialist Grocery Store Scheme

    July 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    What Happens If You Don’t File Taxes on Time?

    December 16, 2022
  • 2

    More Americans plan to buy gifts for their pets than in-laws, according to new survey on holiday spending

    December 2, 2022
  • 3

    What is a CPA?

    December 6, 2022
  • 4

    Tax Credits

    November 25, 2022
  • 5

    Asset Management vs. Wealth Management: What’s the Difference?

    January 4, 2023
  • 6

    Can You Inherit Debt?

    December 13, 2022
  • 7

    4 fast money lessons from our Tesla winners

    December 23, 2022

Categories

  • Economy (115)
  • Editor’s Pick (37)
  • Investing (20)
  • Stock (20)
About Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Email WhiteListing Contact Us

Disclaimer: keepovertradings.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.
The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2024 KeepOverTradings.com All Rights Reserved.

Keep Over Tradings – Economy, Investing, Editor's Pick, Stock
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Stock
Keep Over Tradings – Economy, Investing, Editor's Pick, Stock
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Stock
Copyright © 2024 KeepOverTradings.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Populist Rage Against Credit Cards Will Backfire...

July 7, 2025

Business Conditions Monthly April 2025

June 20, 2025

The Economics of Divorce: A New Paper...

June 11, 2025